![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
third grade lesson: what is culture? |
||
| a one-day unit to accompany the study of Native Americans and early European settlement | ||
an anthropological approach to curriculum developed by |
||
| Content for this lesson speaks to the guidelines set out in the History – Social Science Content Standards for California Public Schools found at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/histsocscistnd.pdf. | ||
INTRODUCTION Word choice here is informative; where the state has used the words “immigrants” and “newcomers,” a historian would probably have said “colonists.” “Immigrants” in particular refers connotatively to the people who came to this country after it was established as an independent nation; those who came to convert or subvert its natives are more properly seen as conquerors. Use of the word “explorer” romanticizes what was largely an imperialist economic enterprise. The State’s attempt at verbal neutrality commits the sin of omission by withholding the truth. Educators, despite this, must be truth-tellers. Telling the truth about our history requires us to look at it from multiple perspectives. The American experience of nation building is a story whose plot turns on the Native American experience of colonization; the two are inextricably intertwined. Since it is difficult to communicate this complexity to our students, we sometimes employ a “human diorama” tactic that reduces native peoples down to the essentials of what they wear, what they eat, and what they build. The “newcomers,” by contrast, are accorded a position as complex actors who are planners, explorers, and innovators with a greater mission to achieve. Reductionist and Eurocentric, this approach denies our students their right to a realistic cultural history that gives them the critical thinking skills and compassion necessary to successfully navigate their futures. While we cannot change the content guidelines, we can adjust our approach to meeting them. If we re-frame our questions from an anthropological point of view, we can provide our students with tools not just for understanding, but for respecting every perspective in the overall narrative.
AN ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONTEXT IN BRIEF We must study those who differ from us while also studying ourselves, granting neither party primacy nor intellectual advantage. We recognize only that people in different places are presented with diverse challenges and varying resources with which to overcome them, so they come to invent different solutions. We respect and admire all human beings for their incredible capacity to adapt to nearly any circumstance.
STEP ONE: INTRODUCING THE CULTURE CONCEPT We must also do all that we can to avoid the “point-and-look” approach of focusing on all that is different about unfamiliar people and look instead for points of identification. After all, as human beings we all have the same interests at heart: Finding something good to eat, and staying warm and safe. Native American peoples and European colonists started off in the same place, seeking to assure themselves of these necessities. Their cultures, emerging in different environments with vastly different resources, led them to adapt different strategies for success. Early encounters between Native Americans and Europeans must have induced culture shock on both sides – a sense of anxiety and confusion in the midst of something radically different from all of your previous experience. The Europeans were sometimes shocked by the relative nakedness of the inhabitants or the fact that they were wearing animal skins. The Native Americans, for their part, were hard pressed to imagine why people would confine their bodies so completely. While the Europeans could never abide the latitude of freedom often accorded to Native American women and children, the Native Americans themselves generally had no taste for the corporal punishment they saw among the colonists. Folks were doing point-and-look on both sides. You can avoid repeating this pattern with your students by first explaining to them what culture is. Use the “What is Culture” PowerPoint slideshow and script as a starting point for discussion; it concludes with the word “respect,” which is an adequate one-word summary for the concept of cultural relativism. The script is available to you in .pdf format and debriefing questions are listed on the “Lesson Objectives Sheet;” please contact the author for more information. If you wish to provide your students with a first-hand experience of culture shock, an effective classroom simulation is available from Simulation Training Systems at www.simulationtrainingsystems.com. Called “Rafá Rafá,” the game can be used to organically explore the “tendency to disparage anything another person or group does which we don’t understand. This realization gives the teacher an opportunity to help students examine their own biases.” This is a necessary first step for preparing students for an academic encounter with cultural diversity. Consider beginning your lesson with the game; playing it and discussing it afterward will take about two hours. You can then use the slideshow as part of your debriefing, which should take another hour to an hour and a half. While this completes your one-day unit on culture, you can use the “Step Two” and “Step Three” documents to help plot your course forward from here. |
||
Additional Materials (available from the author by request): |
||
Recommended Materials: |
||
| contact me for more information | ||